Donna Tartt’s spellbinding new novel, The Goldfinch, stirred me to the point that I sent a text to best-selling author Sarah Bird saying that I wanted to take her up on her suggestion that we compare notes after I’d finished The Goldfinch. She texted me back saying, “You won't believe this, but we're on Grand Cayman Island! Would love to talk Goldfinch when I get back.” Since I feared I was cutting into Sarah’s Tortuga Rum Punch time, I cut our chat short, but our brief back-and-forth did include the descriptors “dazzling,” “stunning,” “astonishing,” and “overabundance.” The Goldfinch was Sarah’s maiden venture into audio books, and she was completely wowed. As I didn’t relish straining a hand trying to hold up the 784-page tome, I, too, did the audio version, which was particularly well presented by actor, David Pittu.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt
Donna Tartt’s spellbinding new novel, The Goldfinch, stirred me to the point that I sent a text to best-selling author Sarah Bird saying that I wanted to take her up on her suggestion that we compare notes after I’d finished The Goldfinch. She texted me back saying, “You won't believe this, but we're on Grand Cayman Island! Would love to talk Goldfinch when I get back.” Since I feared I was cutting into Sarah’s Tortuga Rum Punch time, I cut our chat short, but our brief back-and-forth did include the descriptors “dazzling,” “stunning,” “astonishing,” and “overabundance.” The Goldfinch was Sarah’s maiden venture into audio books, and she was completely wowed. As I didn’t relish straining a hand trying to hold up the 784-page tome, I, too, did the audio version, which was particularly well presented by actor, David Pittu.
As you’ve no doubt gathered by now, yes, The Goldfinch is a standout book of the
year, and is one of my top five favorites of 2013. Here’s why:
Most (but not all) of Tartt’s writing is so
illuminating that it takes your breath away and sends you down introspective
bunny trails.
In researching to write this review, I learned a
fascinating new word, Bildungsroman, a German word used in literary criticism
to describe the coming-of-age literary genre, which is how many reviewers (but
not this reviewer) categorized The
Goldfinch.
Strangely, in spite of the fact that the story is narrated
by Theo, and author Tartt certainly gives him a ton of wordy musings from which
we should be able to glean his personality, I just really never liked him much,
or even felt I knew him well. Boris on the other hand, was an open book, and a
good one at that. He was a drinker, a drugger and a scoundrel, but he was a
lovable scoundrel who never pretends to be anything else. Theo on the other
hand, who was also a heavy drinker and drugger (learned at the knee of Boris),
is a not so lovable scoundrel because he pretends to be a good guy, and wants
to be a good guy, but he really isn’t.
Before I get further into my review, let’s look at the
author, Donna Tartt (pictured), who is from the state that claims to have more
famous writers (Faulkner, Welty, Grissom, Williams, Foote) than people who can
read - Mississippi. Her college mates at Bennington (Vermont) included
boyfriend, Bret Easton Ellis (American
Psycho and Less Than Zero) and
friend, Jonathan Lethem (Motherless
Brooklyn and The Fortress of
Solitude). Here’s a link to some hard-to-find facts about
Tartt’s personal history, which is pretty intriguing. Tartt’s first book, Secret History (1992) was a runaway best
seller, and her devotees (including Stephen King) have waited patiently and
impatiently for her to publish again. You may not care about Donna Tartt right
now, but after you read her, you will; but back to The Goldfinch.
New Yorkers, Theo Decker (age 13) and his mom step into the
Metropolitan Museum of Art to escape the rain, and to view mom’s favorite
piece of art, The Goldfinch (pictured) by Dutch artist (and student of
Rembrandt) Carel Fabritius. Also viewing the painting is an older gentleman
and a young, beautiful girl, who catches Theo’s eye. A terrorist bomb goes off
in the museum taking the life of his mom. As Theo, stunned but unhurt, attempts
to escape the catastrophe, the older gentlemen, in his dying throes, beseeches
Theo to take The Goldfinch to safety, and for reasons on which one can only
speculate, instructs him to contact the gentleman’s partner in a local antiques
restoration shop. Theo escapes the destruction with the painting, but because
it is so strongly tied to his grief for his deceased mother, he cannot bare to
return it to the museum. And thus the stage is set for the reminder of the
story, which spans 20 years or so and involves Theo’s migration from orphan to
temporary ward of a dysfunctional Park Avenue family, to the custody of his
equally dysfunctional father in a skanky suburb of Las Vegas, and back to New
York, where he eventually goes into business with the museum gentleman’s
antiques shop partner. And then there’s Amsterdam, about which I will not speak
(spoiler). Okay, let’s just say that Theo gets involved in criminal
activity.
Along the way he encounters a long and colorful list of characters,
some of which loom very large in his life. One is Theo’s best friend, Boris, a
Ukrainian delinquent with the savvy of a senior, and the amorality,
recklessness and sexual magnetism of a pirate. Perhaps you can tell that I was
particularly attracted to Boris.
There was also Hobie, Theo’s partner in the antiques
business. His purity of spirit and humility and his artistry in the restoration
of antiques were endearing and added a soft side to an otherwise pretty hard
story.
Here’s what bothered me about The Goldfinch. (1) Sometimes the rhythm was a little strange. There
were stretches of intricate detail of mere minutes, then years-long lapses in
time. (2) I felt Theo’s grief at the loss of mother was
diminished because we never knew her. If we’d gotten more than a glimpse of
her, I believe we could have empathized with Theo more. (3) I would have liked for the painting to have more
relevance than just the magic and mystery of art in general. Perhaps a play on
the theme of the bird tethered to his perch, and the main character tethered to
his secret or his mother. (4) Theo’s relationships to women seemed shallow and
underdeveloped whereas his relationships to men were detailed and richly woven.
If we understood why, maybe it wouldn’t have felt so strange. (5) Some of the story lines were so vague – like his relationship with the grandparents - that they seemed sort of pointless to me. (6) Occasionally Tartt wandered off into naval
gazing so deep that I (and others according to reviews I read) became
glassy-eyed – particularly at the end when she waxed so philosophical about the
capacity of art to elevate one to an alternate universe of spirituality.
Notwithstanding, The
Goldfinch is outstanding because a vast majority of the story is
engrossing, most of the characters are fun, and the writing is
exquisite. You will see The Goldfinch
on many “best of 2013” lists, including mine.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I've been holding out on reading this book, but, based on your review, I'm gonna spend the money! Thanks for the detail. I like that your very positive response was qualified with some questions about style, creative license and authorial focus. Reading is such an interpretive act and specific reaction helps so much more than the hyped banter printed on the book cover. Jane
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Jane.
ReplyDelete